Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks do not carry their axes generally around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the news showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence took place in a village bar in Fontaniva, Italy, where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact their revenge on some slots that are unsuspecting after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where watchers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
The machine hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits after blowing off steam. Either it was an indicator of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular machines. Whenever coping with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a bar that is nearby.
‘ He comes in here all the right time to relax and play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a complete lot of money. He could be a laborer and only works any now and then.’ evidently, this is one worker who keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally an extremely quiet man. He just strolled in extremely calmly having an axe and smashed all the devices. There had been several customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the man was sentenced for six months for criminal damage and control of an offensive weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with absolutely nothing more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The next among these two stories is a bit more frightening, once the axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a member of the staff at a betting store in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes betting shop in Cardiff ‘in circumstances of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making down with a few money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or even worse if he did not comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the crime stated that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm on the nights the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate with all the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police referred to as a ‘quantity of cash,’ therefore the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the local public for information that could assist apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did maybe not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive in the scene.
Whose Casino Could It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst each and every of the three certification battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight throughout the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston candidate that is mayoral threatening a lawsuit over one particular proposition that would put a casino into the royal las vegas the neighboring town of Everett.
The legal choice is linked to the idea that neighboring communities would be suffering from casino projects, but won’t have the opportunity to vote on whether those casinos must be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, an applicant for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of the handful of prospects whom have recommended that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that would be situated in East Boston, as an example.
It is unfair to the surrounding communities when it comes to the proposed Wynn casino project in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote on. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it might have on many Boston communities.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in only one community,’ Conley said throughout a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social receive none of the proposed benefits.’
According to the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually get yourself a vote on whether or not allowing the projects to be built. However, casino designers are needed to negotiate settlement, with arbitration required in the event that gambling enterprises and governments that are localn’t come to a resolution on their own.
Conley has proposed taking a path that isn’t actually outlined in the 2011 casino law regarding the East Boston casino proposal, one that’s being developed by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still granting East Boston veto power within the vote that is entire. In other terms, the casino could have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the complete city so as to be authorized.
Yay or Nay?
While Conley hasn’t specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposition, a Boston Globe survey discovered that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in support of it, with only two coming away against it (with Conley and an added candidate not answering the question). Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the city that is entire vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to just East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been and only the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Regardless if voters back these proposals, only one will ultimately be chosen by hawaii since the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there’s also a contending proposal from Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken up to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of the united kingdom’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got his own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a donation of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired premier recreations company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a wagering store critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna however accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call the shadow business secretary out, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double standards.
Since Gala Coral Group is one of the largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the united states- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign aimed at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the neighborhood roads of his south London Streatham constituency, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a grip on the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there is certainly huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily filling up with wagering shops and payday loan companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly believe anything Chuka ever Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
However, fighting back the corner of this Labour Party MP, a representative for Umunna stated that ‘this contribution was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a personal capacity, and was accepted in respect with all the guidelines and precisely declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the working office of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, and for staffing,’ so it will officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is no more a relative head of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he invested as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group ensures that he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether this is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party that are looking to destroy the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after using this kind of hard stance against the spread of the industry in his regional constituency.
‘ The thing that is only know he certainly believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ stated Bob Neill.
Umunna, who is thought to be a future Labour Party leader, has already experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season his workplace had been accused of modifying his Wikipedia page to show comparisons between himself and Barack Obama.